Project tracking · head to head
Orbiz Cadence vs Jira
Zohaib KhalidPrices checked
Jira is the most capable issue tracker there is, priced per user with a free tier that ends at ten. Cadence is the project tracker inside Orbiz: boards, sprints, issues, sub-tasks, custom fields, comments and reports, with no per-seat price and a live link to the hours and cost behind each project. Choose Jira if your process depends on Marketplace add-ons, automation rules or the Atlassian stack. Choose Cadence if you want a tracker the whole company can be on, connected to time tracking and profitability rather than to a marketplace.
Head to head
Orbiz Cadence against Jira, row by row
Read from Jira's own product and pricing pages. 3 rows are ones Orbiz loses; they are left in.
Swipe sideways to see every column
| Orbiz Cadence | Jira | |
|---|---|---|
| How it is priced | One flat price per organisation, unlimited members, all ten tools | Standard: $9.05 per user a month billed monthly for up to 100 users; flat annual tiers from $900 a year for 1–10 users. |
| No per-user charge | Yes | No |
| Scrum and kanban boards with configurable statuses | Yes | Yes |
| Sprints, sub-tasks and custom fields | Yes | Yes |
| Comments, mentions and activity history | Yes | Yes |
| Workload and delivery reports | Yes | Yes |
| Hours and cost per project from the same platform1 | Yes | No |
| Same people and roles as HR, attendance and payroll | Yes | No |
| Automation rules engine | No | Yes |
| Add-on marketplace | No | Yes |
| Cross-project roadmaps and plans2 | Partly | Yes |
| Confluence, Bitbucket and service-desk integration | No | Yes |
| Connector for Claude and ChatGPT (MCP)3 | Yes | Yes |
- 1Jira needs a time-tracking add-on and a separate cost source.
- 2Cadence sprints link to Trackline milestones; there is no roadmap view on the board.
- 3Atlassian’s Rovo MCP server is generally available for Jira and Confluence (read 2026-10-04).
Vendor prices are US list prices in USD as published on each vendor's own pricing page on , annual billing where the vendor offers it, without first-year promotions. Each product name links to that page. Vendors change prices; if a figure here is out of date, tell us and we will correct it. Orbiz prices are on the pricing page, one flat figure per organisation by headcount band.
In their own words
What each one is good at
Orbiz Cadence
- Projects, boards and configurable statuses
- Sprints, issues, sub-tasks and custom fields
- Comments, mentions and activity history
- Team workload and delivery reports
Jira
- Scrum and kanban boards with backlog, sprints and configurable workflows
- Roles, permissions and audit logs from Standard
- Automation rules with per-plan run allowances
- Cross-project plans and roadmaps on Premium
- Dashboards and reports; Atlassian Analytics on Enterprise
- Sandbox and release tracks on Premium
From Jira's own pages. Best for: Engineering organisations whose process depends on Marketplace add-ons and automation rules.
FAQ
Orbiz vs Jira: what people ask
What does Jira Standard cost against Cadence?
Will Cadence feel familiar to a Jira team?
Can we keep Jira for engineering and use Orbiz for everything else?
Other comparisons
- Orbiz vs Zoho One
- Orbiz vs Bitrix24
- Orbiz vs Odoo
- Orbiz vs Loom
- Orbiz vs Clockify
- Orbiz vs Hubstaff
- Orbiz vs BambooHR
- Orbiz vs ClickUp
- Orbiz vs Connecteam
- Orbiz vs Lark
- Orbiz vs SuiteDash
- Orbiz vs Zoho People
- Orbiz vs Keka
- Orbiz vs Bayzat
- Orbiz vs ZenHR
- Orbiz vs PayPeople
- Orbiz vs WebHR
- Orbiz vs Slack
- Orbiz vs Microsoft Teams
- Orbiz vs Google Chat
Still deciding between Orbiz and Jira?
Tell us your team size and what you use today. You get one flat figure for all ten tools and a working organisation to try alongside what you have.
