Screen recording · alternatives
Loom alternatives: browser screen recorders compared on price, analytics and sharing
Zohaib KhalidPrices checked between and
Teams look past Loom for one of two reasons: the per-creator price once everyone records, or the 5-minute cap and 25-video limit on the free tier. A Loom alternative should record screen and camera in the browser with nothing to install, share by a link you can expire, and tell you who watched. Below are the options that do that, with each vendor’s published price, and where Loom still has the edge.
Why teams look past Loom
Usually pricing and packaging, not the product
Loom is async screen and camera video messaging, owned by Atlassian, for teams replacing meetings with recorded walkthroughs. The reasons a team shops around are almost always about how it is sold.
- Business is about $15 per creator a month billed annually; a team where everyone records pays for everyone.
- The free tier caps recordings at 5 minutes and 25 videos per person.
- AI summaries and chapters sit on a higher tier again.
- Recording is one job; teams often want it beside the tools the recording is about.
The shortlist
6 options, including Loom and Orbiz
Published prices from each vendor's page. Orbiz is one row, not the answer — the last column says when each one is the better pick.
Swipe sideways to see every column
| Product | Small-team price | Free tier | Why it is on the list |
|---|---|---|---|
| Orbiz GrabrScreen recording & screenshots · one of ten tools on the platform | No per-user price. One flat fee per organisation for all ten tools and unlimited members, from $99 a month billed annually. | No free plan; a working organisation to evaluate before any commitment. | Every member records from the browser with no seat to buy; links expire or take a password, and view analytics show who watched. |
| LoomPer user per month; free Starter tier; Enterprise by quote. | Business: about $15 per user a month billed annually, $18 billed monthly. Business + AI about $20 / $24. | Starter: 25 videos per person, 5-minute cap per video, up to 50 members. | The incumbent. Best for: Teams that want the most polished recorder and will pay per creator for AI editing. |
| ZightPer user per month; free Share tier; Scale by quote. | Create: $9.95 per user a month billed annually; Collaborate $12. Monthly figures not published in text. | Share: one user, 1 GB, 5-minute recordings, last 50 captures. | The closest to Loom in daily use, plus screenshots, GIFs and annotation; a sensible move for support teams. |
| TellaPer user per month, billed annually or monthly; Enterprise by quote. | Pro: $13 per user a month billed annually; Premium $19. Monthly billing is offered, but its figures are not in the page text. | No free plan on the pricing page. | For the videos you edit before sending — transcript cuts, auto zoom, 4K export — rather than quick replies. |
| Screen StudioOne subscription, yearly or monthly, with every feature on both; macOS only. | Yearly: $9 a month. Monthly: $29 a month. Students and educators get 40% off. | No free plan in the pricing section. | A Mac app for demo videos that should look produced; one subscription, not a team workspace. |
| ScribePer seat per month, billed yearly or monthly; Pro Team starts at 5 seats; a free Basic edition; Enterprise by quote. | Pro Team: $13 per seat a month billed yearly, $17 monthly, from 5 seats. Pro Personal: $25 / $35, from 1 seat. | Basic: guides captured from web apps in the browser, shared by link or embed. | When the walkthrough should be a written guide with screenshots, not a video at all. |
Vendor prices are US list prices in USD as published on each vendor's own pricing page between and , annual billing where the vendor offers it, without first-year promotions. Each product name links to that page. Vendors change prices; if a figure here is out of date, tell us and we will correct it. Orbiz prices are on the pricing page, one flat figure per organisation by headcount band.
Orbiz Grabr
What Grabr covers — and what Loom does that it does not
What Orbiz Grabr does for a team leaving Loom, and the two things Loom does that it does not. Keep both in view when you decide.
Included in Grabr
- Screen, tab or window recording in the browser, with region select, webcam, microphone and system audio
- Sharing kept private, opened to the organisation or sent by link, with a password and an expiry date
- View analytics, plus viewer comments and reactions on each recording
- An embed player that unfurls as a play card in Slack and X, and retention rules for old recordings
Where Loom is ahead
- Loom AI: auto titles, summaries, chapters, filler-word removal and video-to-document
- Enterprise controls: SSO and SCIM, a Salesforce integration and a 99.95% uptime SLA
If either of those is the reason you use Loom, keep it. The case for Orbiz is the platform around the tool, not a longer feature list.
FAQ
Questions about leaving Loom
Is Orbiz Grabr a direct replacement for Loom?
What does Grabr cost per creator?
Where are recordings stored and who can see them?
Leaving Loom? Price the whole stack instead.
Tell us your team size and the tools you pay for today. You get one flat figure that covers all nine Orbiz tools, and a working organisation to try.